Friday, August 31, 2007

Heresy and My Ensuing Wrath

Disclaimer: The writer of this post is by no means a perfect measure of Godliness. His opinions do not in any way reflect the other writers of this blog.

A few days ago, I wrote two posts on this blog which I have now deleted for being contradictory and irrationally bashful. This, my dear friends, is the expression of my infuriation, with nearly all of that crude dementia filtered out.

Charismatic denominations of Christian faith place emphasis on its belief that Christianity does not have to be an ancient practice where worship is limited to hymns and the temptation to fall asleep in services is rampart. Instead, modern congregations such as Hillsongs have gained much attention for delivering modern worship music - something that appeals much more to the increasingly pop-culture-obsessed youth of today.

Stephen Tong, a noted Indonesian reformist preacher is extremely frank about his disapproval of this unorthodoxy found in such churches. I, being a member of his congregation, am one of these people who are not particularly happy of this fusion of rock concerts and services. We have been criticized for being culturally uptight and chauvinistic in our views against these more modern denominations.

Personally, I don’t necessarily mind listening and singing to these rock Christian songs. It’s the purpose of these songs that bother me. Followers of charismatic denominations argue that these songs allow people to have fun in church, to make church a place where everyone wants to be. But one must question, does devotion have to be fun? Is surrendering your own soul to a greater power supposed to be something easy? And more importantly, is this added fun to the whole Christian experience serving for a greater purpose?

As the line between rock concerts and church services become less apparent, what is to differentiate church from actual concerts? What is to keep people from attending church for the sake of mere ecstasy? I know I used to attend a charismatic church for this reason, like many of my peers who look forward to church as a fun place to jump around to ear-deafening music. Motivations and intentions are distorted to a vortex of self-gratification as we abuse “worship.” And while hymns composed by the likes of Bach and Handel are much less fun and enjoyable to sing to, they surely allow for more sincere devotion and is less prone to such decadent misuse.

And though this deformation of church into a concert hall is bad enough in itself, words don’t even begin to describe how tragic the pretension found in our school chapels is. During this week’s chapel, the twelfth-grade chapel band, performed “The Time Has Come,” a song from the Hillsongs United We Stand album. To my dismay, the song was accompanied by a two-minute-long intro that was completely unnecessary. It occurred to me that though the solo had not been necessary, its inclusion allowed plenty room for guitarists to show off their talents in plucking metal strings. It is ridiculous how chapel is taken advantage by non-Christian musicians as a showcase for their talent, to the extent that chapel is no longer a place for glorifying God, but a place for self-glorification. Chapel has now become a talent show that is involuntarily attended where students are forced to watch conceited displays of arrogance under the illusion of worship. Oh, the tragedy.

Music happens to be a significant source of revenue for the Hillsongs church. Their albums have consistently gained top positions in the Australian charts, as they are designed to do so. My friend rashly blamed Hillsongs for these "necessary" intros, ignoring the previously stated fact. The inclusion of two-minute-long solos in their albums is obvious in cause - to make their albums more appealing to the general public - to make their albums sell more so that their church can expand (which is by all means appropriate for a growing congregation), and to make the concerts (where these albums are recorded) more appealing to all who pay to watch it (including those non-Christian watchers who watch for the mere sake of fun).

One must thereby question whether or not the inclusion of these show-off sessions in our chapels serves for a good purpose. After all, are our chapels meant to please the mainstream public? Aren't the circumstances of Hillsongs United, - where songs are written to appeal to the public - completely unparallel with the circumstances of chapel worship? Aren’t we then abusive hypocrites who would be stoned to death by the Catholic Church for heresy if we lived in ancient times?

To abuse Christianity to the point that church becomes comparable to rock concerts and talent shows is beyond wrong. It is horrifying, appalling, petrifying, mortifying, disgusting, and worthy of vomit. And what is worse is that everyone is too ignorant to see and do anything about it.

So please, excuse us “chauvinists” for being “uptight” in our religious views. After all, aren’t we entitled the right to be angered by the blatant abuse of His benevolence? Tolerance for such senselessness is no virtue – it is merely a tool used to circumvent people from doing the right thing.

It is clearly obvious that the abolishment of charismatic denominations would be nonsensical and inconsiderate of those who are truly sincere about their faiths. Replacing rock with hymns in our school would lull most people to slumber and anger those die-hard rockers. So at the very least, dear rockers, take your vile condescension somewhere else - a club, a bar, a concert, just anywhere other than our chapels. To those who come to church for fun, look elsewhere for your bliss - a club, a bar, a concert, a place where those guitarists go to showcase their talent. Do so and we will all finally be pleased - guitarists will freely venerate themselves, jumpers will jump to the guitarists' self-veneration, devotion will no longer be abused, and you hypocrites will no longer feed my bitter soul with this raging wrath.

Deal?

Labels: , , , , ,

11 Comments:

  • At September 1, 2007 at 12:32 PM, Blogger DaNte said…

    guthness... you taunting freak - -"

     
  • At September 1, 2007 at 10:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    anther point id love to say, about the topic=
    although i dont think its wrong to use rock music and bands to worship God (a way of using your talents for worship), sometimes these types of music tend to make your emotions rush because of the music and not the desire to praise God and it DOES cause problems how the kind of ecstasy you see in worships have no connection with Jesus.

     
  • At September 3, 2007 at 8:03 PM, Blogger  said…

    Hey Karina,
    It's good to see you being outspoken and unafraid to express yourself. Let me now outline my viewpoint as a Music teacher and a Christian who has visited and learned from different denominations, including mainstream Christian, Reformed, Charismatic and even Catholic. Remember: I'm not attacking you.

    The heart of worship is God. Music is a tool. Let no one confuse that. BOTH REFORMED AND CHARISMATIC MUSICIANS ARE IN DANGER OF SELF-GLORIFICATION:

    First, throughout history, both Catholic (Mozart) and Protestant (Bach) churches have employed the better musicians in their service. Rightly so! If they had employed bad singers and musicians, the congregation would have left! You see, the church needed to make sure the congregation would enjoy if not tolerate the music! It would be difficult for the clergy to communicate their message if the congregation had first resented the music. Likewise, in our times, some people will feel more comfortable with hymns, some with contemporary songs. It is a matter of preference.

    Second, who says Classical music is easy? It takes a great deal of skill and virtuosity to perform it well. If you have studied Classical music seriously, you would know this very well. Church singers and musicians since a long time ago have been considered the better performers in the society. As sinful humans, these people (regardless of denomination and musical preference) are all in the danger of becoming arrogant like Lucifer himself. All of them are in the danger of providing the congregation with worldly enjoyment and ecstasy (who says Classical music cannot cause ecstasy? I find it thrilling!) which has no connection with Jesus.

    I've first-handedly heard Stephen Tong stated: 'The only music fitting to praise God is classical music'. My Dear, that is not Biblical at all. Carefully study the Old Testament and you will find that priests in ancient Israel had praised and worship God with shouting, 'make a joyful NOISE to the Lord', with bodily expression such as falling prostrate. One quick example: "Moses and Aaron then went into the Tent of Meeting. When they came out, they blessed the people; and the glory of the Lord appeared to all the people. Fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed the burnt offering and the fat portions on the altar. And when all the people saw it, they SHOUTED FOR JOY and FELL FACE-DOWN." Leviticus 9:23-24.

    Shall you defend S. Tong regardless of what the Bible says? Then who are you worshiping? God or your denomination?

    Again, music is a tool. Any tool is in the danger for misuse. During worship, regardless of your musical style, God seeks your heart.

    God is the heart of worship.

     
  • At September 4, 2007 at 6:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment has been removed by the author.

     
  • At September 4, 2007 at 7:27 AM, Blogger  said…

    I don't think it's fair to start labeling people 'Reformed' and 'Charismatic' and accuse the Charismatics of being drunken clubbers. You are over simplifying. Each denomination has its weaknesses.

    What if the 'Charismatics' start labeling 'Reformed' congregation of being proud, haughty and slanderous (and in a sense, also become hypocrites who are blinded of their own weaknesses)?

    "For God does not show favoritism ... There is no one righteous, not even one ... No one will be declared righteous in His sight by observing the law ... There is no difference, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." Romans 2:11; 3:10,20,23

    I personally don't agree with the notion that Tong deserves to be arrogant. No one does. Remember: Lucifer was banished from heaven for his arrogance.

     
  • At September 4, 2007 at 11:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    While all Christians regardless of their denomination all have their respective beliefs, it us undeniable that Charismatic DO have their share of hypocrites (and notably THEIR PREACHERS as well, being materialistically seeking the wealth of his congregation). Nonetheless, Reform, as well have their share of incorrect individuals, and Pak Tong cannot proclaim that classical music is the only way is the right way of worshiping God, the Charismatic are not correct either (in this case I am strictly talking about Charismatic in churches like IES, O2, and several chapel songs). The jumping around signifies the lack of respect commonly circulating the youth who are often forced to attend church.

    Yes, God do look at the heart and as Cynix said, rock worship is often too easily dissuaded as 'fun' and thus ensues idiocy and vulgarity in the supposed worship of the Almighty God,

    and I myself have been through phases of Catholics, Bethany Churches, SPH, Reform and Agnostics.

     
  • At September 4, 2007 at 11:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment was previously posted and deleted - this is a re-post.

    Yes classical music is hard - its virtuosity doesn't even compare to the simplicity of pop music. I know - Ravel's pieces kill me.

    Stephen Tong is a proud man - often arrogant, but notably to be so. But apparently, the members of his congregation are much more sincere about Christianity and worship than those charismatics - many of whom are active Christians by day, drunken clubbers by night.

    And yes, we reformed also enjoy our great music, there's nothing wrong with that. But I have not yet seen a reformist who comes to church for the mere sake of its music.

    Reformed is still les prone to abuse since our youth is much less inclined to liking the classical sorts than the rock-adrenaline-ecstacy types.

     
  • At September 4, 2007 at 3:37 PM, Blogger  said…

    Anon, you sound like Alice Lie ;)
    (Might be wrong, though)
    I like your more objective view though

     
  • At September 6, 2007 at 9:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The reformed faith criticises charismatic denominations for justifiable reasons. While many charismatic members are actually devoted Christians, it is undeniable that many members of charismatic churches ARE in fact, drunken clubbers - a sort of hypocrisy that you can't find in reformed churches.

    Because in reality, the tolerance enjoyed by members of charismatic denominations is often abused - the mentality that "as long as I don't do this and that... I'm fine," causes them to rashly play with fire.

    And while reforms too have their own share of wickedness and hypocrisy, is it so wrong that we avoid such vulnerabilities to sin?

    Because as a matter of fact, charismatic denominations evolved quite recently - about the same time rock-drugs-sex pop culture came to birth; the same time everyone started having sex out of marriage. These faiths are built on unstable ground, compared to more traditional faiths which evolved back in the more morally-sound days.

    And Stephen Tong, too, is human, subject to pride. But I do not claim that he is an extension of God - just someone who is smart and bold enough to do something about the moral deterioration that's really going on beneath the facade of newer faiths.

     
  • At September 6, 2007 at 8:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Besides isn't charismatic churches much more appealing for kids who are forced to attend church by their parents?

    After all, who would want to listen to Stephen Tong preach about some intellectual crap when they could just jump to the awesomeness of Sydney Mohede?

    Being appealing isn't always a good thing. - -"

     
  • At September 12, 2007 at 2:45 PM, Blogger vitriolic said…

    Anita said...

    Anon, you sound like Alice Lie ;)
    (Might be wrong, though)
    I like your more objective view though


    that was not alice lie.. -.-'''' err.. yeah..

     

Post a Comment

<< Home